Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning

Many fields of study have shown that group discussion generally improves reasoning performance for a wide range of tasks. This article shows that most
of the population, including specialists, does not expect group discussion to be as beneficial as it is. Six studies asked participants to solve a standard reasoning problem—the Wason selection task—and to estimate the performance of individuals working alone and in groups. We tested samples of
U.S., Indian, and Japanese participants, European managers, and
psychologists of reasoning. Every sample underestimated the improvement yielded by group discussion. They did so even after they had been explained
the correct answer, or after they had had to solve the problem in groups. These mistaken intuitions could prevent individuals from making the best of
institutions that rely on group discussion, from collaborative learning and work teams to deliberative assemblies.