Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
An article recently published in Scientometrics sheds light on the way
ResearchGate works in calculating its RG score, which seems to be affected primarily by
the members’ engagement in the social network environment, and only secondarily by
publications. Here we show that the will to understand the rationale behind the score
should also consider the ratio between full-text sources uploaded to the repository and
publications. The finding supports the claim that the RG score is not a reliable indicator of
scientific and academic reputation. Instead, it appears to be much more a tool to implement
the entrepreneurial strategy of the RG’s owner company.
ResearchGate works in calculating its RG score, which seems to be affected primarily by
the members’ engagement in the social network environment, and only secondarily by
publications. Here we show that the will to understand the rationale behind the score
should also consider the ratio between full-text sources uploaded to the repository and
publications. The finding supports the claim that the RG score is not a reliable indicator of
scientific and academic reputation. Instead, it appears to be much more a tool to implement
the entrepreneurial strategy of the RG’s owner company.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Scholarly social network; ResearchGate; RG score; Academic reputation; Bibliometrics; Altmetrics
Elenco autori:
Copiello, Sergio; Bonifaci, Pietro
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: